| Subject: BBC: The
Evidence Against Wiranto
British Broadcasting Corporation Sunday,
13 February, 2000
The evidence against Wiranto
PHOTO: Pro-Indonesian militia vowed
integration or death
By former Jakarta correspondent Jonathan
Head
It was at the beginning of last year that
we first started to hear reports of attacks by new pro-Indonesian militia
gangs in East Timor.
It was not, however, the first time the
Indonesian army had used such a tactic.
Soon after their invasion of East Timor
in 1975, local people were recruited to help fight the pro-independence
guerrillas who continued to resist the occupation.
In the early 1990s, paramilitary youth
groups were formed by the Indonesian military to counter the clandestine
campaign against Indonesian rule being conducted by Timorese civilians in
the towns.
PHOTO: The general has denied arming the
militiamen
Army commanders routinely denied any
connection with the groups, but according to official military documents
obtained by the BBC in 1998, the paramilitaries came directly under the
local army command structure.
Evidence that the military were behind
the new militias became even clearer.
Last February I sat in the headquarters
of the Indonesian garrison in Dili, waiting for an interview with Colonel
Tono Suratman, the local commander.
Next to me was a group of rough-looking
Timorese.
One had part of his ear missing. He
explained that they were part of the Garda Paksi, a pro-Indonesian
paramilitary group, and they had come to obtain more weapons from the army
to combat the increasingly assertive pro-independence movement.
They were welcomed like friends by the
soldiers. I have little doubt that they got their guns.
Integration or death
A few days later I met Cancio Cavalhao
and Eurico Gutteres - little known back then, but later to become the two
most notorious militia leaders.
Cancio explained how he had been given
modern automatic weapons by the Indonesian military, and how he had used
them in an attack on a village
Eurico was shy with us - it was only
later that he developed an appetite for bombarding the media with
emotional and often contradictory speeches - but Cancio was quite explicit
about what they were planning, and who was helping them.
A good-looking former civil servant in
the Indonesian Justice Ministry, he had just formed his own militia group,
Mahidi, an acronym for Live or Die for Integration with Indonesia.
He explained how he had been given modern
automatic weapons by the Indonesian military, and how he had used them in
an attack on a village in which six people died, including a pregnant
woman.
If President Habibie persisted with his
plan to offer East Timor independence, he said, the militias would fight
to the death, and destroy the country.
Our reports at the time were widely
publicised in Indonesia, and General Wiranto, then the armed forces
commander, was asked about them. He simply denied that they could be true.
He also supported the formation for
so-called People's Defence Groups under the army's command, even though
militia leaders like Cancio Cavalhao were allowed to lead these groups.
Blood-splattered church
Last April, the militias began expanding
from their stronghold near the border with Indonesia towards Dili.
The local priest told us how Indonesian
soldiers and riot police helped the militias in their attack.
In their path lay the seaside town of
Liquica, a known pro-independence stronghold.
Three of my colleagues and I arrived
there a few hours after they took it over.
There was blood spattered all around the
church. Badly wounded men lay groaning on the ground. Several women wept
hysterically, saying dozens of men had been slaughtered.
The local priest later told us how
Indonesian soldiers and riot police helped the militias in their attack on
the town's population - we could still see militia leaders and soldiers
chatting and smoking together. The final death toll from Liquica may
exceed 50.
We reported the army's involvement, and
the way militias were killing with impunity.
General Wiranto did nothing. Against all
the evidence, he described the incident as a clash between pro-and anti
Indonesian gangs.
Soldiers cheered militias
On 17 April, hundreds of militiamen were
allowed to rally in front of the Governor's office, waving their weapons.
PHOTO: Militia leader Eurico Gutteres
Anywhere else in Indonesia this would not
have been tolerated. But in East Timor, the Indonesian soldiers cheered
their paramilitary allies.
Led by Eurico Gutteres, the militias then
went on a rampage through the town that left at least a dozen people dead.
We filmed him and his men, using
automatic weapons with their Indonesian army serial numbers still clearly
visible, firing into a house where more than 100 were hiding. The 17
year-old son of pro-independence campaigner Manuel Carrascalao was one of
those killed.
When I tried to approach the house, armed
Indonesian police blocked my way. Behind them, the militiamen could be
seen using army trucks to take the bodies away.
I raised the clear collaboration between
the two with several Indonesian officials, and was told to mind my own
business.
General Wiranto was interviewed that
night, and insisted that his men had done everything possible to control
the violence.
No action was taken against any
militiamen. They moved about Dili freely, displaying their Indonesian
weapons as a warning to the rest of the population.
Strict hierarchy
The militia attacks, and the refusal of
the Indonesian military to stop them, continued after the arrival of the
United Nations in May.
It is highly unlikely that the order to
back the militias did not have General Wiranto's direct approval
The UN complained frequently to General
Wiranto. Just as often he promised to curb the militias, but although
there were some lulls, they were never long.
The appalling scenes of destruction we
witnessed last September were merely an escalation of what had been going
all year, indeed throughout the Indonesian occupation.
We now have documents and tapes that show
beyond doubt that the militias were being armed and directed by senior
commanders of the Indonesian military.
It is inconceivable that General Wiranto
did not know about this - in fact, given the strict hierarchy within the
armed forces, it is highly unlikely that the order to back the militias,
or perhaps even to set them up, did not have General Wiranto's direct
approval.
There is some evidence that by last
September, General Wiranto had started to lose control of the monster he
helped create.
But from everything I witnessed during my
seven trips to East Timor last year, there is a powerful case for him to
be held responsible for many of the terrible events that took place there.
-----------
BBC, Monday, 14 February, 2000, 04:27 GMT
Newspaper backs Wahid
PHOTO: Abdurrahman Wahid: "Clear and
explicit decision"
Jakarta daily newspaper Media Indonesia
has praised President Abdurrahman Wahid's decision to suspend security
minister General Wiranto.
The paper cautioned however that Mr Wahid
would have to take a final decision on whether to sack General Wiranto or
not at some point, and could not simply leave him indefinitely suspended.
Here are some excerpts:
After two weeks of uncertainty and
controversy concerning the position of Co-ordinating Minister for Politics
and Security Wiranto, President Abdurrahman Wahid has finally made a
decision - to stand Wiranto down from his position as minister.
This decision was made overnight, on a
holiday, and a day sooner than planned, in view of the urgency of the
issue.
The decision was clear and explicit, in
contrast to the preceding controversy, which has bewildered us all - a
controversy of President Wahid's own making.
But the president has now met
face-to-face with Wiranto, and has taken a wise decision. The wisdom lies
in Wahid's decision to suspend Wiranto, to facilitate the latter's
investigation.
This way, Wiranto has not been dismissed
outright, but also has not resigned. Gus Dur (pseudonym of President
Wahid) wins, and Wiranto also wins. They both win, because the real winner
is the supremacy of the law.
Wise decision
A president has the right to sack his
ministers. On the other hand, he also has a responsibility to uphold the
law.
One way of avoiding the perception of an
egotistical, arbitrary administrative style is through careful attention
to upholding the supremacy of the law.
That is why we regard the decision just
taken as a wise one. This way, the assumption of innocence is also
respected.
But we should caution that the Wiranto
case should not eventually repeat what happened in the case of former
Attorney General Andi M Ghalib.
He was suspended from his position after
charges of bribery by business people in financial trouble were laid.
Ghalib was never brought to trial, but he was never re-instated either.
The case was allowed to lapse, and in
fact he remains attorney general (suspended) to this day - an
unprecedented situation.
Aside from that, the Wiranto case will
perhaps be a lesson for the president, so that he will think before he
speaks, and refrain from issuing further bewildering and contradictory
statements.
Back to February Menu
World Leaders Contact List
Human Rights Violations in East Timor
Main Postings Menu
Note: For those who would like to fax "the
powers that be" - CallCenter V3.5.8, is a Native 32-bit Voice Telephony software
application integrated with fax and data communications... and it's free of charge!
Download from http://www.v3inc.com/ |