The Mining Menace of Freeport-McMoRan
by Pratap Chatterjee
The Multinational Monitor (April 1996)KOPERAPOKA, New Guinea -- On Friday, March 8,
1996, a vehicle belonging to mining company Freeport McMoRan knocked down William Kogoya,
a Dani person from Waa, near the company's giant mine site in Indonesian-controlled Irian
Jaya, the western half of the island of New Guinea.
Freeport says that Kogoya was hurt in an accident, but other sources claim that they
heard Kogoya was beaten and tossed into a creek where he was later found by a Freeport
expatriate worker.
Rumors spread rapidly that Kogoya had died, stirring unrest among the local people. Two
of his relatives -- Guarimo and Binut -- were reportedly denied access to the hospital.
Two days later, local residents heard more reports of rough treatment at the hands of
Freeport staff. "We heard that a woman and her son, from the village of Banti, were
pushed out of a shopping center in the mine site on Sunday by Freeport security
officials," says a local human rights activist, who asked not to be named.
"They were very scared and they tried to run. One of them fell and was bleeding in
the head. They returned to Banti, which is about five minutes drive from [Freeport company
town] Tembagapura to tell other villagers."
The early March events ignited long-smoldering embers of resentment among indigenous
people in the area surrounding the Freeport mine. "A crowd of men, women and children
who were really mad marched to Tembagapura at about noon to confront the Freeport
security," says the activist, who estimates that there were approximately 3,000
protesters.
"They were armed with bows, arrows, sticks and stones and they attacked the
security office. The violence continued on Monday morning when they attacked offices,
schools and the shopping center breaking windows, throwing out files and computers and
damaging cars."
"We fight against [Freeport Chief Executive Officer] Jim Bob Moffett, Freeport and
the government," says a statement issued by the protesters. "We fight because
our rights are not recognized, our resources are extracted and destroyed while our lives
are taken," it reads.
Freeport closed down its mine for most of the week as the violence spread to Jayapura,
the capital of Irian Jaya, when army officials refused to allow local people to see the
body of a freedom fighter who died mysteriously in prison in Jakarta. Five people were
killed in the riots before the army restored calm.
"Due to vandalism and sporadic violence in Timika, Freeport shut down operations
for a few days. Operations resumed on Thursday, March 14 at about 4 p.m. and returned to
normal levels about four hours later, says Kristin Lamkau, a Freeport spokesperson at the
company's New Orleans headquarters.
Lamkau confirms that some windows and testing equipment were damaged at the company
environmental laboratory, but denied that any other damage had occurred.
The newspaper The Australian estimates that Freeport lost $9 million in production and
that $2 million worth of damage was inflicted on company property.
The day the mine was re-opened, Moffett, accompanied by heavy security, met with local
leaders and promised to develop a plan of action to solve local grievances. The plan,
together with an independent environmental audit, is to be made public in April.
Wasting the waters
Local grievances are rife in the area around Freeport's mine, probably the world's most
controversial. Allegations of major environmental damage and human rights abuses have
provoked investigations and protests in the United States and riots on the island itself.
Freeport McMoran has shaved off more than 120 meters of the 4,884 meter-high Puncuk
Jaya Mountain -- the highest peak between the Himalayas and the Andes, lying approximately
90 kilometers to north of Koperapoka -- to extract copper and gold.
Vast quantities of ore-bearing rock from the world's largest gold mine and
third-largest copper mine are ferried by an aerial tramway to a mill, where the ore is
crushed and mixed with water and other additives to allow the metals to float to the
surface. The concentrated slurry is then piped 112 kilometers away to the coastal town of
Amamepare, where ships carry the precious cargo for further processing in Spain and Japan.
Further refining yields some $7.2 million worth of metals every day.
The remaining waste from this operation -- more than 110,000 tonnes a day -- is dumped
into the rivers that course down the mountain into the swamps below, where the indigenous
Komoro peoples have lived in the village of Koperapoka for centuries. The name of the
village is ironic because it is a Dutch bastardization of two Komoro words which mean
"the place of the palm tree."
Environmentalists say that the palm trees were killed by the waste from the Freeport
mine. And the Komoro say that that this is not the only impact of the waste. This January,
Agnes Amai died in a small two-room shanty house in Koperapoka. Her brothers say that
abscesses developed on her face and armpits a day or two before she collapsed.
"It happened just after she collected some food at Payefe where the contamination
from the Freeport's copper and gold mine is very heavy," claims Amatus Amai, her
brother.
Freeport vehemently refutes this account. "The reports of `mystery diseases' have
been investigated by our medical experts, by government medical experts and by journalists
such as yourself," wrote Edward Pressman, spokesperson for Freeport Indonesia's head
office in Jakarta in a faxed statement.
"In each authoritative investigation, there has been no evidence that anything
Freeport is doing in carrying out its mining operations has anything to do with real or
perceived health problems."
Pressman says in addition to providing free medical care to those in need, Freeport
conducts "comprehensive monitoring programs that constantly analyze water
quality." The results are "conclusive ... the tailings [mining waste] are not
toxic and pose absolutely no health threat to the local population whatsoever."
Amai disagrees. "Many people have stomach aches, skin rashes and they often cough
up blood. Freeport set up a clinic for us a year ago but sometimes -- as in the case of my
sister -- there is no time to go there. She died a day after complaining of
problems," he says.
The Komoro say the mine has changed their lives in many ways. For centuries they have
lived off "eraka" and "amena" -- the local words for fish and sago
palm.
"Today it is hard to find the yuaro, lifao, mufao, irao and ufurao -- the
traditional fish that we used to catch," says Agapitus Maerimau, another Komoro
person who lives in Nawaripi, a small community of 160 people, some eight kilometers away.
Maerimau and his family, who used to live in Koperapoka, moved here 14 years ago when
Freeport built them new houses to replace their own which were sinking as a result of the
mining operations. "The fish that we find tastes bitter, like malaria medicine. The
only fish that thrives is the mujahir, a fish from Java. The sago tastes like sand,"
he says.
"We have to walk 20 kilometers from here to find food. The fish we have to buy in
the Timika markets where it costs 2,000 rupiah (90 cents) for five small fish. But we have
no jobs to get money," he adds.
The Komoro peoples are not the only ones to complain about the mining activity. Also
angry are the Amung peoples (also known as the Amungme, the name for a male Amung) who
live in the 17 valleys of the highlands, where Freeport's mine is located.
The Amungme depend on "erom," "mow" and "baw-eh" (sweet
potato, taro and pig) for their food. Today, say the Amung, the leaves of these vegetables
and the skin of the pigs show strange discoloration.
"We call this `aspal' because it looks black like the color of the asphalt on the
road," says Tom Beanal, who works for Lemasa, a non-governmental organization set up
by the Amung. "We don't have any word for this in our language because we never saw
anything like this before," he adds.
Freeport insists all of these charges are baseless. "The allegations of serious
health problems resulting from the tailings, lodged by whomever you spoke with, are
utterly false," says Pressman.
"Regarding the knowledge of aquatic life, while the local people may possess
superior knowledge of local wildlife, our diversity surveys (show that) the Ajkwa river is
very similar to other river systems tested in the number of aquatic species present and
the abundance of those species," he adds.
The Study and Information Centre for Papuan Peoples (PaVo) in Delft, the Netherlands,
says that there is no concrete evidence one way or another on whether Freeport's
operations are toxic.
This is because there have been no independent tests for environmental quality, says
PaVo. Freeport itself only began testing water quality a few years ago.
But based on Freeport's reports of its mining activities, PaVo estimates that 20 to 40
kilometers of the Ajkwa river here will be hazardous to fish and humans for about 15
years. PaVo also projects that a 35-square-kilometer area in the floodplains will be
poisoned over some 35 years, while a 100-square-kilometer area of the estuary and delta
will be contaminated for the same period.
Environmental experts -- both at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and at
Freeport's laboratories -- agree that minute concentrations of waste metals can be toxic.
"One part per million of dissolved copper can present a significant health threat
to humans and animals [but] the copper concentration in the Ajkwa river has been shown to
be roughly 0.007 parts per million," says Pressman.
Controversy comes home
The complaints of the indigenous people have won support in faraway Washington D.C. The
Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) -- a political risk insurance agency owned
by the U.S. government -- withdrew a five-year-old, $100 million insurance policy for the
mine last November.
By way of explanation, Robert O'Sullivan, a lawyer for OPIC, cited environmental
problems associated with "acid mine drainage, ... toxic metals ... and the
mismanagement of solid and hazardous wastes at the site," in a letter to Freeport.
Freeport immediately brought in the heavy hitters. Days before the decision, former
Secretary of State Henry Kissinger called the State Department to stop the cancellation,
according to the Los Angeles Times. The newspaper reported that Kissinger and his
consulting firm received $600,000 from Freeport in 1994.
Indonesian president Suharto also made a personal appeal to U.S. President Bill
Clinton, when they met at the White House, to no avail. James Woolsey, a former Central
Intelligence Agency chief, is now representing Freeport in arbitration proceedings
regarding the OPIC cutoff.
Concerned about news reports concerning Freeport's operations, the World Bank, which
has sold a $50 million insurance policy to the New Guinea mine, recently asked its staff
to conduct an internal investigation into the matter. Freeport was more than cooperative.
This February, Jim Bob Moffett, Freeport's chief executive, flew to Washington to offer
Bank officials a free trip to the mine site in his personal 747 jet.
Bank officials have not taken up the offer to date, but other financial analysts have
been happy to do so. In November, 21 representatives of major investment companies -- 15
from the United States, three from England, two from Canada and one from France -- were
taken to the mine site in Indonesia and to Spain to visit the processing plant.
"I think the OPIC letter is a crock. I looked at the river and I looked at other
rivers nearby and they looked just the same to me. I think Freeport is one of the most
environmentally responsible companies in the world," says Chuck Bradford, a mining
analyst at Union Bank of Switzerland in New York.
"Mind you, I'm not an environmental expert, but I've seen a lot of other mines
around the world. I think that OPIC pulled out because of reports of human rights abuses.
But we were told that they happened 90 kilometers away," he adds.
Corporate rights or human rights
These abuses, blamed on Indonesian army officials guarding the mine, took place over a
variety of occasions and have been documented from eyewitness accounts by H.F.M.
Munninghof, the Catholic bishop of Jayapura, the capital of Irian Jaya. The report was
translated and published by the Australian Council for Overseas Aid (ACFOA) last August.
According to the bishop's report, on Christmas day 1994, people from three churches in
the villages of Arwanop, Banti and Waa gathered near the mine site to pray after a major
peaceful demonstration protesting the mine.
After the religious ceremony, a group of 15 people left to go to the Freeport company
town of Tembagapura but were arrested on the way by a group of soldiers who accused them
of being thugs.
One of the 15, who requested anonymity, says that the group were beaten and locked into
a Freeport "container" at eight o'clock in the morning on Christmas day.
"The 15 of us were beaten with sticks and rifle butts and were kicked with boots
by the troops ... until about noon. They stripped us stark naked and took our belongings
such as beads and money," says the member of the group.
The group was released from the container and escorted by soldiers on to a Freeport bus
which was on its way to Timika.
One of the group -- Wendi Tabuni, a 23-year-old man from Timika -- "tried to jump
out of the window but one soldier quickly jumped up and stabbed him in the belly with his
bayonet ... [but he] still jumped out of the window and ran away," says the group
member who requested anonymity.
"The bus stopped at once and a number of soldiers jumped down and without warning
shot Wendi in the head. The soldiers took his body and threw it in a ravine," he
adds.
The other 14 were taken to the Freeport workshop in Koperapoka at about two o'clock in
the afternoon where "we were beaten and tortured one by one by the soldiers."
Three people -- Yoel Kogoya, aged 27, Peregamus Waker, aged 28, and Elias Jikwa, aged
28, -- "were tortured by being beaten with sticks on the neck from behind, left,
right and from the front, till their necks were broken and they died," says the
member of the group.
The following day, Yunus Omabak, a 33-year-old Amung tribal chief from Waa, says he was
summoned to a military post in Tembagapura together with three other elders from his
tribe, to report on the religious service.
Omabak says he was put on a Freeport bus and taken to a Freeport "security
cell." There the soldiers accused them of raising an Organisasi Papua Merdeka (Free
Papua Movement) flag at the Christmas day protest and supplying the rebels with rice and
cigarettes.
"They hit me over the head with a big stone till blood streamed over my body. They
put an iron bar in the hollow of my knees and forced me to squat and lean against a chest
for hours. I was screaming in pain," he says.
"Meanwhile my friend Octo was stabbed with a bayonet in his left shoulder and
armpit till he screamed out loudly. His hands were put on the cement and stamped on with
boots and hit with gun butts. I thought he was dead," says Omabak.
Freeport representatives say that none of their officials were involved in the
incident. They refused to comment on the allegations of torture by the Indonesian
military. "Freeport operates under its host government laws and respects the
jurisdiction of the military, which is responsible for the safety and security of its
people," says Greg Probst, a Freeport spokesperson.
Some 37 people were killed in such abuses in 1994 and 1995 -- no real surprise to local
people who have watched thousands of people die at the hands of army officials in the past
decades. But placing documentation of these incidents into the hands of the priests
appears to have paid off. Since August, no further deaths stemming from army activities
have been reported, and this February army courts sentenced four officers for their role
in the massacre.
Schooling Freeport
The reports of environmental damage and human rights abuse at Freeport's mine in Irian
Jaya have struck a chord in the United States.
Students at Loyola University in New Orleans and the University of Texas in Austin,
both of which receive hundreds of thousands of dollars in grants from Freeport, have held
demonstrations to protest the company.
Following the OPIC decision in November, Loyola students and faculty demonstrated
outside Freeport Chief Executive Officer Jim Bob Moffett's New Orleans mansion. They were
joined by Catholic peace activists from Pax Christi.
The protest was organized by John Clark, a philosophy professor. Clark also works with
an environmental group called the Delta Greens, which has protested the dumping of
radioactive gypsum waste into the Mississippi river from Freeport's phosphate processing
plants in New Orleans. Freeport is the worst polluting company in the United States, based
on the quantity of pollutants discharged into the land, air and water, according to U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency records.
Freeport is also a major sponsor of the University of Texas Geology Department, from
which Moffett graduated in 1961. The company gives the department $1 million a year to
send students to study the mine site in Irian Jaya.
Freeport has also given over $2 million to the university for a new molecular biology
building. In return, the university proposed to name the building after Moffett and his
wife, although the faculty voted to name it after Barbara Jordan, a civil rights activist
who recently died.
In November, a group called Students for Earth Awareness (SEA) held a 37-hour sit-in at
the main university building to protest the university's connections to Freeport. Steven
Feld, a professor of ethnomusicology, quit his job in protest against Freeport.
"We have 3,200 signatures from students calling for Moffett's name to be dropped.
Considering that 4,100 students voted in the last election, we think that's pretty
impressive," Hannah Gould of SEA says.
-- P. C.
Return to Kissinger menu |