U.S. Training of Indonesia Troops Goes on Despite Ban
NEW YORK TIMES
Tuesday, March 17, 1998
By TIM WEINER
WASHINGTON -- The Pentagon has been training Indonesian military forces
since 1992, despite a congressional ban intended to curb human rights
abuses by those soldiers, Defense Department documents show.
The Indonesian forces trained by the Pentagon include a special-forces
commando unit called Kopassus, which human rights groups say has tortured
and killed civilians. The unit has received training from U.S.
special-operations soldiers in skills like psychological warfare and
reconnaissance missions.
Pentagon officials said the training program was entirely legal, since
it took place under a program different from the one curtailed by
Congress. Deputy Secretary of Defense John J. Hamre said in a letter to a
member of Congress last month that the training "enhances rather than
diminishes our ability to positively influence Indonesia's human rights
policies and behavior."
Some members of Congress question that. Rep. Christopher H. Smith, a R-N.J.,
said the training program "appears to be a dramatic end run around
the rules that Congress has carefully prescribed for military training and
education of Indonesian forces."
Indonesia is undergoing its greatest political and economic crisis
since President Suharto took power in 1965. Last week the newly appointed
minister of defense, Gen. Wiranto, warned that the government would crack
down hard on demonstrators protesting repression and corruption.
The troops trained by the Pentagon over the past five years include
Kopassus, whose Red Berets have been deployed this year against street
demonstrators in Jakarta; an army strategic command group called Kostrad
that helps control the center of Java and Suharto's presidential guard.
General Wiranto did not specify what troops would be used in such a
crackdown.
Hamre's argument and the documents detailing the training were
contained in a letter sent last month to Rep. Lane Evans of Illinois, a
Democrat. The letter and the documents were made public Monday by the East
Timor Action Network, which is a human rights group, and by a reporter and
activist, Allan Nairn. Nairn, who was beaten severely, arrested and
permanently banned from Indonesia in November 1991 after witnessing a
massacre of more than 270 civilians by Indonesian troops on the island of
East Timor, published an article in The Nation Monday describing the
training.
In 1992 Congress banned Indonesia from receiving Pentagon training in
the arts of war under the program most commonly used for such courses,
known as International Military Education and Training, or IMET.
The Pentagon kept up its training -- but under a different program,
known as Joint Combined Exchange and Training, or J-Cet. This was a legal
way to avoid the congressional ban, since the joint program was financed
through "a different pot of money" than was IMET, and thus was
unaffected by the ban, a Pentagon official said.
Evans conceded that the training was legal, but called it "the
Pentagon's loophole to the ban." He said he was "curious to know
why U.S. taxpayer
dollars are being wasted on aiding and abetting a ruthless military
organization."
The training "is certainly not within the spirit" of the law,
said Rep. Nancy Pelosi, a D-Calif. "It raises serious questions about
a violation of congressional intent. It is clear that it is a
circumvention of Congress."
Grover Joseph Rees, an aide to Smith, said: "We have all these
restrictions on IMET and they just get around it by using J-Cet." He
added: "They did the same thing in Rwanda -- they give marksmanship
training to people who may be participating in massacres." The J-Cet
program provided training in psychological operations and marksmanship to
the Rwandan Patriotic Army, which has been accused of the massacre of
civilians in eastern Zaire.
The Pentagon was unable to say Monday how much the J-Cet training
program for Indonesia cost, how many troops were trained or which military
office ran the program.
A Defense Department official, who would not be quoted by name, said
the program was no secret to well-informed members of Congress. She said
it was "better to train and engage and interact and gain influence
with successive generations of Indonesia officers" than to stop the
training. She could cite no evidence that the training improved those
officers' respect for human rights.
Congress partially restored financing for training in Indonesia in
1995, under an "expanded" Imet program theoretically limited to
training in human rights, civilian control and accountability. But under
the program, Indonesia was able to buy at least one course in military
training directly from the Pentagon, which was another legal way around
the legislation, Pentagon officials said.
back to U.S.-Indonesia
Military Ties
|