| Subject: IPS: Oil & Good Relations
Don't Mix
AUSTRALIA-EAST TIMOR: OIL AND GOOD RELATIONS DON'T MIX
CANBERRA, (Nov. 29) IPS - Reconstructing a country as devastated as
East Timor will be costly, but revenue from major oil and gas resources in
the nearby sea may provide much of the money needed for such an
undertaking -- that is, if Australia agrees to renegotiate an old
agreement regarding the area.
Ahead of the next round of negotiations with the United Nations
Transitional of East Timor (UNTAET), scheduled for around Christmas,
Canberra has come under pressure to renegotiate its sea boundary with Dili,
and to ensure that a greater share of the revenue from major oil and gas
deposits there go to East Timor.
Large oil deposits have already been found in the area, with one spot
in particular now in production. Estimates of the resources of the
oilfield vary, but UNTAET figures that it could pump as much as $100
million to $200 million a year to the rather anaemic budget of East Timor.
"I believe everybody is waiting for some generosity from the
Australians," Mario Carrascalao, the vice president of the Timorese
political umbrella group, the National Council for Timorese Resistance (CNRT),
said recently.
But Australia may yet act the scrooge. It seems determined to fight to
keep the terms of a 1989 treaty, which says the most oil prospective area
in the waters between East Timor and Australia would be a "Zone of
Cooperation." This means that each nation would be entitled to 50
percent of the revenue from any oil and gas developments there.
Australia had signed the treaty with Indonesia, which was then still
occupying East Timor. The agreement established boundaries between
Indonesia and Australia, which as the only claimant states at the time
enabled the oil developments to proceed with some legal certainty.
In the aftermath of Indonesia's withdrawal from East Timor, however,
Jakarta ceded responsibility for the treaty to UNTAET.
Canberra, though, apparently assumed that the conditions and terms in
the 1989 treaty would remain in force, even if it was already negotiating
with UNTAET, and afterwards with the government of East Timor that is to
be determined at elections scheduled for late next year.
It thus became furious when East Timorese leaders and UNTAET said the
treaty is illegal and that a new one should be negotiated on the basis of
the sea boundary following a midway point between the countries. This
would then see the overwhelming majority of the oil resources under East
Timorese control.
Australia, a major donor to East Timor, has since been claiming that a
renegotiation would jeopardize relations between the two countries.
Earlier this year, Canberra also confirmed its intention to claim the
entire continental shelf in the area of the Timor Gap -- giving Australia
the largest area and access to the oil resources -- rather than adopt a
halfway point.
Timor Gap, also known as the Timor Sea, lies between Australia's
Northern Territory and Timor.
UNTAET and East Timorese leaders are standing their ground. They say
that if necessary, they would take their case to the International Court
of Justice.
What Australia seems to have overlooked is that the United Nations
never recognized the Indonesian annexation of East Timor, and thus does
not recognize the current treaty, including any negotiated boundaries.
UNTAET has told Canberra that unless it negotiates a new treaty before
the East Timor elections, there will not be any in place when a new East
Timor government comes into place.
"The view of East Timor, which was shared by UNTAET, was that the
Australian-Indonesian treaty was illegal because Indonesia didn't have the
authority to make any decisions," the head of the UNTAET negotiating
team, Peter Galbraith said during the last formal talks on the matter in
mid-October.
A former U.S. ambassador to Croatia, Galbraith also warned that
"an independent East Timor is not going to accept" the
"invalid" treaty.
Noting the hundreds of millions of revenues expected from the area's
oil deposits, he added, "This year the annual recurrent budget of
East Timor is $45 million, so you can imagine what an enormous difference
this resource can make to East Timor."
As it is, East Timor authorities are even struggling to allot funds to
purchase schoolbooks.
Australian activists themselves say they are shocked at Canberra's
attitude. James Arvanitakis, campaigns director of the Sydney-based
watchdog group Aidwatch, says he is stunned that the Australian government
has not welcomed the chance for East Timor to be economically independent.
He says, "Here's the chance for the new East Timorese government
to set its own course rather than to rely on donor countries, the World
Bank and the United Nations for funds and having them direct them on how
to run the country."
"The revenues are at least twice their current budget,"
Arvanitakis points out, "and if anything Australia should be advising
them about how to reap the benefits from the oil resources slowly rather
than in a short space of time."
Yet a look at the past would reveal that Australia is only being
consistent. For one of the prime motivations for Australia's support for
the 1975 Indonesian invasion and subsequent annexation of East Timor was
the prospect of discovering significant oil resources that were keenly
sought after the oil price shocks during that era.
An August 1975 cable sent by the then Australian Ambassador to
Indonesia, Richard Woolcott, to Canberra is also telling. This was three
months prior to the Indonesian invasion of East Timor, and Woolcott was
urging the Australian government to agree with Jakarta's plans to make
East Timor part of Indonesia.
Wrote the diplomat: "It would seem to me that this Department (of
Minerals and Energy) might well have an interest in closing the present
gap in the agreed sea border and this could be much more readily
negotiated with Indonesia than with Portugal; or independent Portuguese
Timor."
He noted, "I know I am recommending a pragmatic rather than a
principled stand but that is what national interest and foreign policy is
all about."
Copyright (c) IPS-Inter Press Service. All rights reserved.
November Menu
World Leaders Contact List
Human Rights Violations in East Timor
Main Postings Menu
Note: For those who would like to fax "the
powers that be" - CallCenter V3.5.8, is a Native 32-bit Voice Telephony software
application integrated with fax and data communications... and it's free of charge!
Download from http://www.v3inc.com/ |