On February 22, the Japan East Timor
Coalition handed over its petition on the
so-called "comfort women" issue in
Timor-Leste to the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs of Japan in Tokyo. The petition is
supported by 44 Japanese organizations, 367
individuals in Japan, 14 overseas
organizations and 25 individuals abroad. The
total number of supporters was 450, a
slightly higher than that of last year. We
thank those supporters.
|
The second paragraph was a surprise for us,
because so far the Japanese government had never
tried to deny that there were "victims" of the
military sexual slavery in Timor-Leste. But this
time, it seems that the denial is making a
come-back.
|
(We received emails of support even after
the deadline. We therefore add 4 Japanese
organizations and 20 individuals and 1
overseas organization. The total number thus
becomes 475.)
The hand over of a petition on the military
sexual slavery in war-time East Timor is now
an annual event, and it usually takes place
around February 20, the day of the Japanese
invasion of the Timor island in 1942.
This year's petition picked up the report
that the representative of
Timor-Leste at the Universal Periodic Review
process of the UN Human Rights Council on
the situation of
human rights in Japan last November
referred to "the victims of atrocities
committed in the past" and it encouraged
Japan to promote dialogue with the
international community for mutual
understanding which may entail "a direct and
genuine communication with the survivors of
the past atrocities."
During the conversation with officials of the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs on February 22, when
we handed the petition to them, we requested
that Japan take some kind of action as a
response to this Timor-Leste's statement. But
the response of the officials was passive. It
can be summarized as the following:
The above-mentioned statement of
Timor-Leste only generally referred to
victims and not particularly to victims
in Timor-Leste. We don't judge whether
"the victims" mentioned in the statement
in a general way included victims in
Timor-Leste in particular. We don't know
whether the government of Timor-Leste
wants to raise this issue seriously. If
they are serious, they would raise this
issue in bilateral relations. As we
understand, the government of
Timor-Leste does not have a policy to
raise this issue (with Japan).
Regarding the facts of the "comfort
stations" in war-time East Timor, the
government of Japan could not find that
there were violations or damages caused
by them, although it did find some
reference to the existence of comfort
women in Timor-Leste when it did its
best in researching the history (before
1993).
The governments of Timor-Leste and Japan
both agree to the "forward-looking
policy".
The first paragraph of the Foreign Affairs
ministry's view means that the Japanese
government will not take any action until
the Timor-Leste government demands
something. Such a statement at a
multilateral occasion does not indicate that
they are serious enough.
We pointed out that actually the
Timor-Leste's reference in its statement
cannot be regarded as "general" as the
Japanese governments interprets. To quote
the part more widely, the statement says:
"In reciprocity, making reference to the
concerns expressed by the Human Rights
Committee regarding the victims of the
atrocities committed in the past, we
encourage Japan to continue to its efforts
to promote dialogue with the international
community to reach mutual understanding,
which may entail a direct and genuine
communication with the survivors of the past
atrocities."
Here, "the concerns expressed by the HRC"
exclusively means victims of the "comfort
women" system, and therefore it should be
interpreted as such. And we also pointed out
that "In reciprocity" means the statement
was suggesting the government of Japan
specifically to do what follows it.
The second paragraph was a surprise for us,
because so far the Japanese government had
never tried to deny that there were
"victims" of the military sexual slavery in
Timor-Leste. But this time, it seems that
the denial is making a come-back. It's a
logic that those "poor" women were recruited
by a private enterprise and were kept
"commercially" for Japanese soldiers,
therefore, the military as an institution is
not responsible. Also the logic denies "the
forcible nature" of the system because there
are no official records that describe that
Japanese military personnel forcibly took
those women away like abduction. In the past
communication with the Foreign Ministry,
this kind of logic never came up, possibly
because they knew that the "research" the
government did before 1993 was very limited
in its scope and most importantly because
the Kono statement of 1993 already
recognized the military's involvement in the
sexual slavery. The come back of this logic
seems to represent the Abe administration's
nationalist agenda of denial of the past
atrocities.
We showed a book that collected testimonies
of victims and eye-witnesses and written
records on the "comfort women" during the
war in Timor-Leste to them. They said they
were aware of this book.
Overall, the response was stiff, perhaps
stiffer than before. But we will continue
efforts.
Thank you.
Akihisa Matsuno
Japan East Timor Coalition
see also
Petition to the Governments of Japan
and Timor-Leste
For Timor-Leste Victims of the Japanese
Military's Sexual Slavery System
Restore Their Honor, Give Them Their Rights!
February 20, 2008
(Sixty-six years from the day of the
Japanese invasion of Timor)
We are citizens asking that a thorough
investigation be carried out of the "sexual
slavery system" that existed throughout
Timor-Leste during the Japanese military
occupation in World War II and that the
victims be redressed.
On February 20, 1942 the Japanese Army
invaded the then neutral territory of
Portuguese Timor and then occupied it for
some three and a half years. During that
time the Japanese Army ordered the liurai
(traditional chiefs) and village chiefs to
provide women, and it built "comfort
stations" in areas throughout the territory
where its troops were stationed. Liurai who
did not obey these orders were executed, and
the families or neighbors of the women who
tried to shelter them were brutalized. Women
were conscripted regardless of the their
age; even premenstrual girls were forced to
become "comfort women".
The damage from this sexual violence did not
end with the occupation. After the troops
left, some women were left by their
husbands, others suffered from infertility,
others were left with the offspring of
Japanese men, while others were
discriminated against by their communities.
But after the war under Portuguese, and then
Indonesian rule, this serious crime was
shrouded in historical obscurity and the
victims left to their fate. No one so much
as even apologized to the women: not the
Japanese Government, which is responsible
for the conduct of its military, not the
Portuguese Government, which failed to
protect the women from the Japanese
military, not the Timorese who handed the
victims over to the Japanese, and not those
who scorned and abused them after the war.
However the women's suffering has come to
light through research jointly carried out
by Japanese and Timor-Leste organizations
since 2000, Sixteen women who testified in
the course of this research on the suffering
they themselves endured are requesting an
apology and compensation from the Japanese
Government. Every year Japanese citizens'
groups have met with officials of the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs to convey the
women's request to the Japanese Government.
But the Japanese Government, on the grounds
that it has had "no request from the
Timor-Leste Government", has to date taken
no steps whatsoever, merely saying that when
diplomatic relations were established with
the newly independent state that both
countries agreed to pursue "future-oriented
relations".
The victims are now old and have little time
left. The year before last year Esmeralda
Boe passed away, and last year, Marta Abu
Bere and Clementina Cardoso. With this in
mind, we submit the following request to the
Government of Japan and the Government of
Timor-Leste to restore the honor of the
victims and give them their rights.
- The fact that there has been "no request
from the Timor-Leste Government" is no
excuse. This is a matter in which the
Japanese Government should take it upon
itself to apologize and compensate for the
criminal actions of its own military.
- The Japanese Government should without
delay mobilize all the available data and
acknowledge the damage. The Japanese
Government should formally apologize without
delay to restore the dignity of the victims.
- The Japanese Government should open
discussions with the new government in Timor
Leste, the victims, and relevant
organizations to consider means of
compensating the victims.
- Some Timorese fear that any reference
to Japan's wartime responsibility would
jeopardize Japan's economic assistance to
Timor Leste. Japan's economic power
intimidates tiny Timor-Leste, and the
Japanese Government should clearly state
that development assistance will not be
linked to the issue of wartime compensation.
- The Government of Timor-Leste has the
duty to uphold the rights of its citizens
vis-a-vis other countries. Timor Leste is a
sovereign independent nation. After the war
the Japanese Government paid official
compensation to the Asian victim countries,
including Indonesia. The new government of
Timor-Leste should promptly hold discussions
with the war victims and related
organizations and open negotiations with the
Japanese Government.
The charges made over the last 18 years by
"comfort women" victims in the countries of
Asia have given rise to a social movement
throughout the region and moved public
opinion worldwide. Last year resolutions on
the "comfort women" issue were adopted in
the U.S. House of Representatives (July 31),
the Dutch Second Chamber (November 21), the
Canadian House of Commons (November 28), and
the European Parliament (December 13),
calling for a change in the Japanese
Government's policy on the issue. We
earnestly request that the Government of
Japan and the Government of Timor-Leste take
sincere consideration of these developments
and take the decision to address the issue
in a just manner.
Japan East Timor Coalition - Sapporo,
Sendai, Tokyo, Shinshu, Nagoya, Osaka,
Okayama, Shimonoseki, Oita, Nagasaki
Japan Catholic Council for Justice and
Peace
East Timor and Indonesia Action Network
(ETAN), USA
(list of signers to come)