West Papua Report
July
2013
This is the 111th in a series of monthly
reports that focus on developments affecting Papuans. This
series is produced by the non-profit West Papua Advocacy
Team (WPAT) drawing on media accounts, other NGO
assessments, and analysis and reporting from sources within
West Papua. This report is co-published by the East Timor
and Indonesia Action Network (ETAN). Back issues are
posted online at
http://www.etan.org/issues/wpapua/default.htm Questions
regarding this report can be addressed to Edmund McWilliams
at edmcw@msn.com. If you
wish to receive the report directly via e-mail, send a note to
etan@etan.org.
Link to this issue:
http://etan.org/issues/wpapua/2013/1307wpap.htm
The Report leads with "Perspective," an opinion piece; followed by
"Update," a summary of some developments during the covered period; and then
"Chronicle" which includes analyses, statements, new resources, appeals and
action alerts related to West Papua. Anyone interested in contributing a
"Perspective" or responding to one should write to
edmcw@msn.com. The opinions expressed in
Perspectives are the author's and not necessarily those of WPAT or ETAN.
For additional news on West Papua see the reg.westpapua listserv
archive or on
Twitter.
CONTENTS
The West Papua Advocacy Team announces the granting of the 2013 John Rumbiak
Human Rights Defenders Award to Port Moresby Governor
Powes Parkop. This month's "PERSPECTIVE" provides
an account of the 1998 Biak Massacre by an observer who visited the scene
days after the Indonesian Navy's brutal assault on peaceful civilians there.
UPDATE offers a detailed account and analysis of the
Melanesian Spearhead Group's consideration of Papuans' application for
membership. UNICEF examines the Indonesian government failure to address
the needs of Papuan youth and also reports on Indonesian exploitation of
Papuan youth. The report notes that the police in West Papua have honored
two of their own, notwithstanding their involvement in brutality targeting
West Papuan civilians. The "CHRONICLE" section
notes a new report on the Indonesian military's plans to build a massive highway
system in West Papua, and cites two reports on the Merauke Integrated Food and
Energy Estate (MIFEE) "development" scheme that has already severely damaged
local people's interests. The International Coalition for Papua has a new report
on human rights violations in the territory.
WPAT's 2013 John Rumbiak Human Rights
Defenders Award Goes to PNG's Powes Parkop
|
|
Gov.
Powes Parkop |
|
The West Papua Advocacy Team (WPAT) is pleased to announce
that it is giving its 2013 John Rumbiak Human Rights Defenders Award to
Powes Parkop, Governor of the Port Moresby and the National Capital District
of Papua New Guinea. Governor Parkop is also a member of the Papua New
Guinea Parliament. For many decades, Governor Parkop has sought to improve
the plight of refugees in Papua New Guinea who have fled repression in
Indonesian-controlled West Papua. His advocacy for West Papuan's human
rights, including the right to self-determination, within Papua New Guinea
and in the wider international community has been eloquent and consistent.
Since 2008 the West Papua Advocacy Team has annually honored organizations
and individuals with the John Rumbiak Human Rights Defenders Award, named in
honor of the West Papua Advocacy Team founder. The award consists of a
plaque and a $500 stipend.
Carmel Budiardjo and Tapol (UK, 2008),
John
M. Miller and the East Timor and Indonesian Action
Network (U.S., 2009),
Andreas Harsono (Indonesia,
2010),
U.S. Congressional Delegate Eni Faleomavaega
(American Samoa, 2011), and the
Australia West Papua Association (2012).
PERSPECTIVE
This month's "Perspective" by Edmund McWilliams, a member of WPAT,
describes his visit to Biak in West Papua in the immediate aftermath of the
July 1998 Indonesian military's massacre of peaceful demonstrators there. At
the time, McWilliams was working at the U.S. Embassy in Jakarta. He has
since retired from the U.S. Foreign Service.
Recalling the 1998 Massacre in Biak
In July 1998, I was serving as the Political Counselor in the U.S.
Embassy in Jakarta. Throughout the archipelago, it was a time of turmoil but
also of great hope. In May, the three-decade old Suharto dictatorship had
been overthrown by a popular uprising led largely by courageous young
people, notably university students, who held massive, largely peaceful
demonstrations. Indonesians were united by the dream of "reformasi":
determined not only to put an end dictatorial rule but also to end
corruption in the governing elite; and a determination to end security force
abuse of human rights and to secure accountability of those forces for their
crimes.
|
What transpired in Biak in early July
gave clear indication that in West Papua Suharto-era repression and brutality
were still in force. Those brutal tactics remain the military's modus operandi
to this day.
|
In various parts of the archipelago, popular demands
reflected grievances particular to the area: In East Timor, people demanded
an end to decades of Indonesia's occupation and repression which extended
back to Indonesia's brutal, illegal invasion in 1975. In Aceh,
people sought to end repression and greater political rights. In West Papua
too, there were increasingly assertive, but peaceful demands for an end to
military repression, exploitation, and the systematic violation of basic
human rights, including the right to self-determination.
In early July, residents of Biak, a small island off West Papua's northern
coast, organized a large demonstration to demand Papuan rights. On July 1,
local people peacefully raised the popular Papuan Morning Star flag to
commemorate the anniversary of West Papua's declaration of independence. There followed several days of celebration and
peaceful rallies in Biak. Their demands included the right to vote on their
political future. The demonstrations were fueled in part by an unfounded
rumor that a UN team was about to visit Biak.
The reaction of Indonesian security forces at Biak was profoundly unlike
their response to protests in other parts of the archipelago during and since
the May overthrow of the dictator Suharto. Security forces had employed
brutal force on occasion in confronting peaceful demonstrators, including in
Jakarta. However, especially after the removal of Suharto from office, the
military and police had not for the most part attacked demonstrators. What
transpired in Biak in early July gave clear indication that in West Papua
Suharto-era repression and brutality were still in force. Those brutal
tactics remain the military's modus operandi to this day. Moreover, military
collusion with domestic and foreign corporate interests is as rampant today
in West Papua as it was during the Suharto era.
At dawn on July 6 security forces, mostly those drawn from
the Indonesian naval base on Biak island, attacked the main demonstration on
Kota Biak (aka Water Tower Hill) where the Morning Star flag had been
raised. Peaceful demonstrators, many sleeping or in prayer, were gunned down
by the Indonesian security forces. The military personnel then loaded the
wounded and others onto military vehicles and transported them to the nearby
naval base, where approximately 200 of the survivors of the mayhem were
loaded on naval vessels and taken out to sea. There the survivors - many
still in handcuffs - were thrown into the sea. Others were stabbed before
they were thrown overboard.
In the following weeks, bodies of victims from the
massacre washed up on beaches.
Jakarta authorities claimed that the bodies were victims of a tsunami which
had recently struck Papua New Guinea. The tsunami claim was not credible;
the tsunami's landfall was hundreds of kilometers to the east.
Information about the Biak massacre reached Jakarta slowly
and with little detail. Human rights workers and some local journalists were
prevented from visiting the scene of the massacre and from conducting
interviews with survivors and witnesses. Alerted to the scale of the
massacre by Papuan contacts, I sought permission from my Embassy and the
Indonesian government to fly to West Papua. I was seeking credible first
hand accounts of the massacre. I was only allowed to travel as far as to the
capital Jayapura (Port Numbay). A week after the massacre, when the
Jayapura-bound Indonesian aircraft made a refueling stop in Biak, I jumped
off the plane and did not re-board. I was able to spend several days in Biak
before boarding a Jakarta-bound flight.
A week after the July 6 massacre, I found the entire town traumatized. There
was little activity in the streets, many shops were closed and local people
clearly did not want to be seen talking to a foreigner. I visited Kota Biak
hill. The small field around the water tower was bounded on one side by a
wall where I had been told I could see evidence of the massacre, including
bullet holes and blood. But the wall had been freshly plastered and painted.
An elderly women who observed my search pointed to the legs of the water
tower. These revealed many bullet holes approximately chest high. (The U.S.
Defense Attaché had earlier told the rest of the embassy team that the
Indonesian military had been forced to fire live ammunition to break up an
unruly demonstration at the site, but that according to the his military
sources, the Indonesian troops had fire above the demonstrators' heads.)
While I was reluctant to endanger any Biak residents by seeking interviews,
I was approached by a few people. One young man offered to take me to
his brother who had been badly beaten in the assault. He had escaped arrest
and was in hiding. I chose not to endanger the victim by seeking him out,
but did briefly interview the few people who approached me on the street
including the brother of the man who had been beaten. He told me that bodies
of those killed at Kota Biak had been loaded like wood, thrown into military
trucks along with wounded survivors. He said that when the doors of some of
the trucks were opened at the base blood flowed from the truck beds onto the
ground.
A local Christian pastor whom I had met on an earlier visit confirmed that
bodies had begun to wash up on local beaches, but that military personnel
would not allow the bodies to be buried by local people in Christian
ceremonies. Instead the military took them away. He noted that some of the
bodies were identified by clothing, including political t-shirts distributed
by the Indonesian political parties. He cited this fact as evidence that the
bodies had not been victims of the Papua New Guinea tsunami as claimed by
the government. He also noted that many of the victims had their hands
bound.
The Indonesian government has never acknowledged the Biak massacre. No
Indonesian military personnel have been prosecuted for the crime. The Biak
Massacre is strongly reminiscent of the
1991 Santa Cruz massacre in which
hundreds of East Timorese were murdered by the Indonesian military during a
peaceful march. Those marchers, like the Papuans in Biak who had rallied for
their rights, including the right of self-determination, had been inspired
to demonstrate by the expectation of a UN mission visit. The critical
difference between the two massacres was that western journalists were on
the scene in Dili, East Timor, to record the assault and tell the
international community what had happened. The West Papuans in Biak suffered
and died in silence, their pain obscured then and now by an occupation
regime in Jakarta that has drawn a curtain over this and other atrocities.
The international community, including the UN and
Jakarta's allies in Washington and elsewhere, by their silence, have enabled
Jakarta to hide the bitter truth of on-going repression in West Papua.
For more see the
Biak Massacre
Citizens Tribunal
see also Groups Urge Justice on 15th
Anniversary of Biak (West Papua) Massacre
UPDATE
Melanesian Spearhead Group to Send
Senior Delegation to Jakarta Regarding West Papua
Members of the Melanesian Spearhead Group (MSG), meeting at the organization's
19th annual summit in Noumea, New Caledonia, agreed to take unprecedented action
regarding the plight of West Papua. While the MSG did not agree to a Papuan
application for full membership from the West Papua National Council for
Liberation (WPNCL), regional Melanesian leaders, for the first time,
publicly supported West Papua's right to self-determination. Moreover,
Fiji's Foreign Minister Rau Inoke Kubuabola will lead a fact-finding mission
of all the foreign ministers of MSG member countries to Jakarta. The Foreign
Ministers' Mission [FMM] will report back to the MSG leaders in six months. (The
MSG is composed of four independent states: Fiji, Papua New Guinea, Solomon
Island and Vanuatu, and the New Caledonia/Kanaky party, the FLNKS.)
The
decision to send a senior delegation followed Indonesia's offer to receive a delegation.
This represents an internationalization of the West Papua issue that Jakarta has
repeatedly sought to avoid. A high-level delegation is also supposed to
travel to West Papua. The MSG endorsed continuing consultations with Indonesia
regarding a "roadmap" for consideration of the West Papuan application for
membership. The MSG members also voiced specific concern about human rights
observance in West Papua.
|
|
West Papuan delegates from the WPNCL at the MSG
plenary session in Noumea. Photo by Ben Bohane/PiPP |
|
The decision not to grant West Papua membership in the MSG disappointed some.
Vanuatu's Prime Minister Moana Carcasses addressed the summit on June 21 and
shared his frustration:
- "History will judge us for the decisions that we make here now and
in the future, our failure today to take decisive decision....will be
exposed by future generations. Our motive .... will be laid bare by our
future generation."
Radio New Zealand's Johnny Blades interviews with key summit
participants revealed that concern over MSG "cohesion" was critical in
the decision to defer full MSG membership for Papuans. Specifically, Papua
New Guinea's public recognition of Indonesia's "territorial integrity" that
includes West Papua was the most important obstacle in reaching an MSG
consensus about the territory. PNG Prime Minister Peter O'Neil skipped the MSG
summit to fly to Jakarta.
Fiji has recently expanded commercial and other ties with Indonesia
and, apparently in service of this relationship, was unwilling to support
MSG membership for the Papuans. Other MSG partners, though more sympathetic to
the application, deferred to the PNG and Fiji leaders.
The
MSG Summit Communiqué, issued June 20, provided a detailed account of
the leaders' consideration of issued related to West Papua. With regard to
Papuans application for membership in the MSG, the communiqué stated:
Application for Membership
Leaders noted that a road map in relation to the application by West
Papua National Council for Liberation (WPNCL) for membership should be
based on clear and achievable timeline. Leaders acknowledged that the
human rights violations need to be highlighted and noted that to
progress the WPNCL's application, it was important to continually engage
with Indonesia. Leaders agreed to establish a process of dialogue and
consultation with Indonesia. Leaders noted and welcomed the invitation
from Indonesia to invite a Foreign Ministers' Mission to be led by Fiji
and that confirmation on the timing of the Mission was being awaited.
The outcomes of the WPNCL's application would be subject to the report
of the FMM mission.
Under the category identified as "Decisions," the communiqué reported
that
the leaders had,
(i) endorsed that the MSG fully supports the inalienable rights of
the people of West Papua towards self-determination as provided for
under the preamble of the MSG constitution;
(ii) endorsed that the concerns of the MSG regarding the human rights
violations and other forms of atrocities relating to the West Papuan
people be raised with the Government of Indonesia bilaterally and as a
Group;
(iii) noted the application received from the WPNCL to be a member of
the MSG and that the application will be reviewed after the submission
of the Ministerial Mission's report; and
(iv) approved the Roadmap as recommended by the FMM which included:
a) that the MSG send a Ministerial Mission at the FMM level to be led by
Fiji's Foreign Minister to Jakarta and then to West Papua in 2013 and accept the
invitation of the Government of Indonesia;
b) the Ministerial Mission to present its report to the Leaders at the
earliest opportunity within the next six months;
c) the WPNCL to be officially informed of the MSG Leaders' decision
regarding its application; and
d) the Mission would be part of a process in determining WPNCL's membership application.
WPAT COMMENT: The failure of the MSG summit to grant membership to
West Papua reflects the power and influence which Jakarta wields,
particularly with Papua New Guinea with which it shares a long and troubled
land border. PNG Prime Minister Peter O'Neil visited Jakarta just prior to
the MSG summit to sign several major agreements including an extradition
treaty that some fear could place Papuans who have fled from repression to
PNG in jeopardy.
That the West Papua membership issue assumed such a high profile at the
summit is testimony to the strength of the Papuan case, the effectiveness of
its Papuan advocates, and the courageous adherence to principle of several
of the MSG members, notably Vanuatu. The undeniable progress of the Papuan
case at the MSG at this summit was remarkable given the very heavy
diplomatic pressure exerted by Jakarta, mostly behind the scenes, to derail
the Papuan membership initiative.
Indonesia Fails Papuan Youth
A new
UNICEF initiative has underscored the deprivation youth face in West
Papua. The UN agency is working with local officials on a new youth policy.
The initiative follows a 2012 UNICEF survey that found that Papuan
adolescents and young adults experienced many challenges.
West Papua remains the poorest and most underdeveloped regions in the
archipelago.
A lack of quality education put youth at risk of unemployment. Girls often
quit school to get married. Nearly a third of all girls are married before
turning 18. Early marriages put them at risk of early pregnancy and
complications in childbirth.
Meanwhile,
Tempo reports that as many as 500 West Papuan children will be
schooled in high schools in Java and Bali. The central government is funding
the so-called "affirmation program" to "strengthen the relationship among
cultures and uniting them as one brotherhood under the same nation."
WPAT Comment: A May 4 report in the Sydney Morning Herald,
They're Taking our Children,
detailed the removal of thousands of Papuan children from West Papua to life
in Java. Many of the children wind up as street urchins. Two decades ago
Indonesian officials similarly removed children from occupied East Timor to
Indonesia. Many of these children wound up as street beggars and child
prostitutes in Indonesian cities. Some were eventually transformed into
spies by the Indonesian military and employed in East Timor. Indonesia has
not only failed Papuan youth, as documented by UNICEF. It has also sought to
exploit West Papua's greatest resource, its young people, including by
suborning them into "affirmation" programs.
Police in West Papua Honor Human
Rights Violators
The Police Chief in West Papua, Tito Karnavian,
honored two officers of
the Jayapura City Police in specific recognition of their action in
violating Papuan human rights. Those honored on June 14 were Commissioner
Kiki Kurnia, head of operations of the Jayapura City Police, and Brigadier Afandi,
member of the public order police (Dalmas). They were recognized
for their actions in inciting a riot, dispersing it, and then using the
police-initiated violence to arrest Victor Yeimo, the chairman of the
National Committee of West Papua (KNPB. The two subsequently led police in
intimidating and violently attacking demonstrators, resulting in one of the
victims having his arm broken by the police.
The ceremony took place on the one year anniversary of the killing in cold
blood of Mako Tabuni, the Secretary General of the KNPB. He
was murdered by police in neighboring Abepura. No one has been held
accountable for his murder.
CHRONICLE
New ICP Report Details Extent of Violations in
Papua
Human Rights and
Peace for Papua: The International Coalition for Papua (ICP) recently published its third report on the human rights situation in Papua.
The
2013 report documents cases of violations of civil, political, economic,
social, cultural, as well as indigenous peoples' rights, between October
2011 and March 2013.
The report was prepared by a group of human rights organizations based in
West Papua, Jakarta and abroad. Human rights violations continue at a high
level, while impunity widely prevails. Jakarta's approach of accelerated
economic development has caused a widening of the social gap. Frustrations
over continued violence and injustice angers indigenous West Papuans, who
"often lose their traditional livelihoods as a result of deforestation. "
The Indonesian Army Opens Doors for Greater Corporate
Exploitation in West Papua
A new report
examines the growing opposition in West Papua to Jakarta's plans to use
the military to build an extensive road system in West Papua (Presidential
Regulation 40 of 2013). The plan is purportedly to advance development, but
it will expose rural Papua to greater exploitation by the military and its
corporate allies, while deepening the marginalization and repression of
Papuans.
New Group Seeks to Block MIFEE
So-called Development Plan
A new
grassroots organization has formed in West Papua to unite local
opposition
to the Merauke Integrated Food and Energy Estate (MIFEE). The organization,
"Formasi Ssumawoma," seeks to assert local interests by demanding respect
for customary (adat) law, particularly of the Marind Anim indigenous peoples
in the Merauke District who are the primary victims of the MIFEE
"development" scheme.
The MIFEE project was supposed to turn Merauke into Indonesia's "rice barn"
to feed Indonesia, then feed the world.
In reality,
in just one village, where MIFEE pioneer Medco has been operating for two
years, five children have died from malnutrition or simple illnesses in the
last few months and dozens more still suffer. Meanwhile, the company is
profiting by turning the forest that the villagers depend on into wood chips to
fuel power stations in South Korea and elsewhere. The grand irony of MIFEE,
already obvious, is shown even more clearly after this tragic news.
Link to this issue:
http://etan.org/issues/wpapua/2013/1307wpap.htm